Author(s):د. فتح الرحمن القرشي
Abstract
Abstract :
The approach of the experts of ╒adīth sciences towards some ruw┐t (narrators) of a na╖╖ (╒ad┘th text) is neither absolute acceptance nor absolute refusal regardless of whether they are authentic or unauthentic. Even the authentic narrators’ text can be rejected on the basis of the context in which the text is narrated. Likewise, the unauthentic narrators’ text should not be rejected in the context where the narrator is assumed to be authentic. The narrator might have been of weak memory, but his reported text may be accepted because of his long companionship to that particular Sheikh whereby he acquires strength. The present article is limited to the study of unauthentic narrators whom text about a particular Sheikh has been accepted by Ab┴ D┐w┴d in his Sunan.The objective of the study, which has been conducted by going deeply through relevant reliable sources of the field and the opinions of experts, is to extract and identify such narrators and narrations. It was found that Im┐m Ab┴ D┐w┴d has authenticated quotes of six weak narrators from a particular Sheikh, namely: Ayy┴b b. Suwayd, ‘Amr b. ‘Uthm┐n, Qurrah b. ‘Abd ar-Ra╒m┐n, al-Muthann┐ b. al-╗ab┐╒, Muj┐lid b. Sa’┘d, and Hish┐m b. Sa’d. While the number of their quotations reach to forty three nu╖┴╖, i.e. twenty four (Hish┐m b. Sa’d), twelve (Muj┐lid b. Sa’┘d), four Qurrah b. ‘Abd ar-Ra╒m┐n, and one each of Ayy┴b, ‘Amr and al-Muthann